A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

CofE vs. Anglicanism

Interesting column by Giles Fraser:

the genius of the Church of England has been to allow different theological temperaments to wor­ship alongside one other, united by common prayer and community spirit. This was how we recognised each other as members of the same Church. This was our particular charism, and we were widely valued for it.

In Anglicanism, however, the joys of common prayer and community spirit are replaced by ideology. This Anglican Church is a new invention, a global piece of post-colonial hubris, driven by those who feel that a Church that is genuinely Catholic must have outposts throughout the world.

Bishops get on planes and fly to other parts of the world to sit in com­mittees with other bishops, hammer­ing out policy — although no one in the secular world cares two hoots about what they decide. Over time, these meetings have created a new Church with a single-issue magis­terium based on an unhealthy fascina­tion with what gay people do in their bedrooms. This, apparently, is how we are to recognise each other as Anglicans.

I try to avoid commenting on the affairs of other churches (though, I guess given the full communion arrangements between TEC and the ELCA I have some stake in it). But the obsession with keeping the “Anglican Communion” together is blowing the importance of an institution–one that I can scarcely remember hearing about just a few years ago–all out of proportion. And actual living, breathing human beings are getting ground under the wheels in the process. I’m not sure what kind of ecclessiology really underwrites this effort to create what looks like an ersatz Catholic Church. Maybe it’s that Anglicans never seem to have made peace with being Protestant (or reformed, if you prefer).

Hopefully the Lutheran World Federation can maintain its existence as just that: a federation bound together by bonds of affection and sharing in good works. The last thing we need are more top-heavy church bureaucracies.

One response to “CofE vs. Anglicanism”

  1. The hot-button issue right now is a deal-breaker just like differing views on the Eucharist, on the necessity of apostolic succession and on WO are…

    But the obsession with keeping the “Anglican Communion” together is blowing the importance of an institution – one that I can scarcely remember hearing about just a few years ago – all out of proportion.

    As Theo Hobson quoted a bemused parishioner somewhere a few years ago: ‘Anglican Communion, vicar? I thought we were Church of England.’

    It’s still hard for somebody with roots in Anglo-Catholicism to do but I stopped caring when I realised they were talking about denominations that commune any baptised Christian, true of both the left and the right in this row, and not two one-true-church claims duking it out. So, on Anglicanism’s own terms, all the talk of schism and ‘leaving the church’ is overwrought bunk.

    (And I’ll say it: a dynastic, nationalist and Erastian schism from Rome preaching against schism deserves to be laughed at.)

    In the end all it means is one side’s bishops might not be invited to England every 10 years to meet the Queen: the Episcopalians or ACNA might save a few bucks.

    Maybe it’s that Anglicans never seem to have made peace with being Protestant.

    Obviously not, which was why Anglo-Catholicism came to be.

    Catholics agree with the right on the issue at hand but also hold that sharing the creeds and orthodoxy on same-sex sex are not enough to form a coherent church; the conservatives, like the liberals, are Protestants.

Leave a reply to The young fogey Cancel reply