A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

“it’s hard, if not impossible, to be a meat-eating environmentalist”

Via John Schwenkler, Rod Dreher interviews James McWilliams, who Dreher calls a “contrarian agrarian.” He is a fierce critic of our system of industrial agriculture, but he also slaughters some sacred cows (pardon the expression) of the organic food and locavore movements. He has some kind words for GMOs and particularly questions the sustainability of even “free range” meat operations. Overall, though, he’s suspicious of any silver bullet for food sustainability:

The future of food production must achieve a balance between high yields and high sustainability. The only way I see this happening is if we stop polarizing our discussions of food into big industrial and small organic, and start seeking common ground over compromises that split differences. We’ll have to eat much less meat, many more whole grains, fruits, vegetables and legumes; tolerate the judicious use of chemicals in the production of our food; keep an open mind to the potential benefits of biotechnology; and worry less about the distance our food traveled than the overall energy it took to produce it.

McWilliams book, Just Food: How Locavores Are Endangering the Future of Food and How We Can Truly Eat Responsibly, comes out in August.

One response to ““it’s hard, if not impossible, to be a meat-eating environmentalist””

  1. […] big organic might be a very desirable alternative. What I take McWilliams to be saying here (and elsewhere and, I presume, in his forthcoming book) is that there’s no silver bullet solution to eating […]

Leave a reply to Looking beyond the labels « A Thinking Reed Cancel reply