A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Saved by theology

So, today at church I was roped in to assisting with communion at the last minute, something I’ve never done before. I was distributing the wine, which we do by pouring it from a chalice into tiny plastic cups that people take from a tray on their way to the altar rail. However, if, for whatever reason, they prefer to receive grape juice instead of wine, they take pre-filled cups from the tray.

I was a bit uncertain and nervous, trying to avoid spilling the Savior’s blood all over the place and whatnot, and forgot to say “the blood of Christ shed for you” when passing by some of the people with the grape juice-filled cups. This caused me to worry that somehow I’d “invalidated” their reception of communion, until our vicar reminded me that, in any event, receiving in one kind is sufficient. A good example of how sound theology can make up for human incompetence–mine in this case.

13 responses to “Saved by theology”

  1. You mean your church has the mini shotglasses of the blood of Christ? I thought that was a Methodist thing (none of the UMCs I attended had that, but many did). Now at my new church I’m trying to get used to the common cup of wine. Took this grape juice Methodist a few months to get past the “hey, ho, that’s wine!” shock every time I took a sip.

  2. Yeah, I don’t approve of the shot glasses. All the other churches I’ve belonged to have used the common cup, with some people preferring to intinct (though not me).

    Is grape juice the universal Methodist practice?

  3. That’s a good story. As I read I was afraid it was going to be a story like the one about Luther licking the wine up off the floor, which, of course, was one of the Catholic’s reasons for serving only in one kind.

    On the more reverent side, I love assisting with communion. I was also on the altar guild a few years ago and that was a wonderful experience, to be entrusted with the care of the elements. My favorite thing was setting up for baptisms.

  4. The theological question is one of validity. And you offered the correct answer, theologically.

    But there is another more subjective question worth asking. How do people feel when the words are not spoken to them? I think the difference is similar to the difference between being told “Christ died for the world” and “Christ died for you.” On some level they end up meaning the same thing. On another they are very different.

    The Supper, though corporate, is a consolation for the individual conscience.

    When I assist, I am careful to say all the words to each communicant. When I have been on the receiving end, I could console myself with theology when the assistant has said only some of the words to each person, and I seemed to just happen to be in the mix. And that has helped. But I know that people love hearing the words, in part because I love hearing the words. When the pastor adds my name into it, all the better. “Rick, the body of Christ, given for you,” is purest Gospel.

  5. Yes, all United Methodist churches only use grape juice.

    I was thinking about this further – isn’t it only the Words of Institution spoken by an ordained minister/priest that make the eucharist valid? I don’t think anything a lay person says has any affect on the validity of the eucharist.

  6. Not sure if Jennifer was writing to me, so I’ll give an answer, but anyone else feel free to chime in.

    Yes. As far as validity goes, the Words of Institution do ensure that. So we’re not in the realm of whether someone did it “wrong.”

  7. So far as I know Rick is correct about the “validity” question. But he’s also right, in my experience, that hearing the words “the blood of Christ, shed for you” are an important part of receiving the promise. It certainly is for me. Which is why I felt so bad about slipping up. 🙂

    That’s funny about the UMs–this is related to their historic teetotaling I presume?

  8. It is!

    I’ve usually heard “body of Christ, broken for you” and “blood of Christ, shed for you” but now I hear more often “body of Christ, bread of heaven” and “blood of Christ, cup of salvation.” I wonder why?

    Also, as someone who’s grown up with the grape juice, I feel odd about letting Brigid have the wine, so I don’t, knowing that receiving in one kind is sufficient. Can’t quite explain why – one sip of wine won’t hurt a three year old, but for some reason I just don’t – do children take the wine in the ELCA and Episcopal church? Also, part of me is afraid she’ll think it’s “yucky” and announce that in a loud voice.

  9. The custom in most churches I’ve been to is that if the child is “of age” to receive (usually this means they’ve had their first communion after some sort of instruction) then they’re free to receive in both kinds. Though I guess it’s up to the parents whether they receive the wine or the juice.

  10. Instead of being admonished about how you may have screwed up, you deserve to be thanked for stepping up in a situation where you had little experience and would have been perfectly justified in saying no.

    The church needs more volunteers like you Lee!

  11. Thanks! But in fairness it was mostly self-admonishment. 🙂

  12. Well then I admonish you for admonishing yourself!

  13. Consider me admonished! (Or is that meta-admonished?)

Leave a reply to Lee Cancel reply