A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Extremism in the defense of beer

Great story about the rise of craft brewing in the US, focusing especially on Dogfish Head Brewery in Delaware, maker of various “extreme” beers (really hoppy ales, beers with offbeat ingredients, etc.). For my birthday I treated myself to a 4-pack of their 90 minute IPA. Yummy stuff.

The article, though, becomes a kind of philosophical debate about the nature of beer: is beer best defined within strict parameters, such as those enshrined in the (unfortunately named) German “Purity Laws”? Or can beer encompass all kinds of odd ingredients and styles? When is a beer not a beer?

I was also charmed by the Trappist monk/brewer interviewed in the article who named Budweiser as his favorite American beer. Being catholic–at least in my taste in beer–I certainly appreciate the King of Beers on occasion (even if it’s now owned by a Belgian brewer!).

One response to “Extremism in the defense of beer”

  1. That is an interesting debate. At first glance, my brain says, “Go progressive! Put all kinds of weird stuff in there and let me drink it!” Yes, I’m in California and we have a rather forward looking brew-culture here. But then I think to myself and I’m realizing that the beer I drink most comes from a little brewery called Lightning Brewery here in San Diego, and they’ve kinda gone scientifically back to real traditional German/Bavarian style beers.
    I really enjoy some of the wacky beers in theory, and I love to taste them and ponder them. In practice however, I’ve found myself recently drinking different traditional/purist beers more often than anything else.

    Ah what a conundrum you’ve placed before us, Lee. Might as well just drink…

    Cheers!

Leave a reply to Jason Cancel reply