A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Calling all Trekkies

I’m more of a casual Star Trek fan than a hardcore Trekkie (sorry, Trekker), but this Entertainment Weekly article makes J.J. Abram’s (of Lost fame) upcoming reboot of the franchise sound somewhat promising.

I thought this in particular was interesting:

Abrams says he was also drawn to the project because he believed in — and wanted to evangelize — Trek’s unabashed idealism. ”I think a movie that shows people of various races working together and surviving hundreds of years from now is not a bad message to put out right now,” says Abrams, whose infectiously upbeat energy and disdain for cynicism are among his most marked attributes. (Not for nothing did Abrams give Randy Pausch, the now-late author of The Last Lecture and avowed Trekker, a cameo in the film.) That ethos may seem cornball to an America darkened by a decade’s worth of catastrophe, but after an election season that has seen both presidential nominees run on ”hope” and ”change,” Star Trek just may find itself on the leading wave of a zeitgeist shift — away from bleak, brooding blockbusters and toward the light. ”In a world where a movie as incredibly produced as The Dark Knight is raking in gazillions of dollars, Star Trek stands in stark contrast,” Abrams says. ”It was important to me that optimism be cool again.”

The original Star Trek, as has been pointed out ad nauseum, acted as a metaphor for Kennedy-era Great Frontier-style idealism, while the Next Generation had more of a globalist, multicultural vibe and less Kirk-style unilateralism. It’ll be interesting to see what kind of spin Abrams puts on the culture and politics of the Trek universe.

6 responses to “Calling all Trekkies”

  1. I’m inbetween a casual and hardcore fan (softcore?) and I’m very excited about the movie.

  2. Yeah, I probably know a little too much of the arcana to call myself a strictly “casual” fan. Though I almost never watched Voyager or DS9! I swear! And Enterprise? Never! 🙂

  3. You weren’t missing much with DS9, IMHO. What was cool about ST and even TNG was the Odyssean quality where they were travelling all around, fighting monsters, making love to space nymphs, etc. DS9 just stayed in one place and got really dull to me, depite Michael Dorn’ and Colm Meany’s awesomeness.

    I think another stationary ST venture is a bad idea. I think a lot of the sucess of the newly “regenerated” Dr. Who in its Eccleson and Tennent iterations has been the Odyssean-ness. We get to fight monsters all over space and time with the Dr. and the babe of the season, and we still have that optimism that somewhere out there is a man with two hearts and a solution. I think Dr. Who has finally out-trekked Trek.

  4. I tried to watch one of the more recent iterations of Dr. Who, but it just didn’t click. Maybe I should give it another shot.

  5. I’ll be very interested to see how this turns out. I hope it revives the old show’s sense of fun; I like some of the later series but they got to be awfully complicated and serious.

    One thing I noticed from the cast list: they seem to have trimmed the female regulars down to Uhura. They have other female characters outside the ship, but gee, it was so male-heavy to begin with, what happened to Nurse Chapel and Yeoman Rand? (I guess it’s too much to ask to bring back the amazing hairstyle…)

    Also not sure how I feel about the revamped bridge, judging from the picture. I liked the old crayon-box palette! Why does everything high-tech have to be gray? It will look just as dated as the old one soon enough…

  6. Well, maybe it’s Uhura’s turn to shine! As we know from “Star Trek: The Wrath of Farrakhan,” all we got to see of her was the back of her nappy wig!

Leave a reply to Lee Cancel reply