A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Perspective

I continue to be mystified by the Sarah Palin love-fest and the Sarah Palin hate-fest. Clearly, she’s touched a nerve with the conservative grassroots and set off at least some lefty bloggers and commentators.

To my mind this doesn’t change anything. But then, I wasn’t the target audience for this move. McCain is still McCain, and the GOP is still the GOP. Daniel Larison and Jim Henley elaborate.

I am surprised to see so many paleo-cons, “crunchy” cons, etc. warm up to the McCain-Palin ticket. Palin is “one of us,” I’ve seen people say. And the attacks on her (though exaggerated in my view), simply show the disdain that the “liberal elites” have for “real” Americans. Never mind John McCain’s horrible (from their perspective) positions on everything from Iraq to immigration.

As someone who had hopes that a cross-ideological common ground could be found between more traditionalist conservatives and some elements of the left on issues like war, civil liberties, executive power, the environment, and a sustainable ecomomy, this is a bit dispiriting.* But maybe that was always an exaggerated hope anyway. Maybe this just shows that cultural issues still run deeper than most anything else.
——————————————
*Not that there aren’t good reasons to mistrust the Dems on these issues too.

6 responses to “Perspective”

  1. The attacks on her from the left have been of two kinds.

    First, those based on real issues, which are also of two kinds: (a) those based on her powerful commitment to the Christian right and the particular positions associated with that and (b) the question of her being up to the job.

    Second, those that are mere scurrilous attacks on her and her family, coming close to the outright “trailer trash” line.

    I gather the second line, and (b) from the first, above, are the parts you have in mind for your charge of “elitism”?

  2. Just to clarify – I’m not charging “the left” (an absurdly broad category to begin with) with “elitism” – I was paraphrasing what I take to be the view of many conservatives. I also don’t think that only red-staters are “real” Americans. 😉

    I agree with you – the smears against her and her family are totally out of bounds, but as far as I can tell those are mostly coming from blogs, etc. Hardly representative of “the left” as a whole. Questions about her views and experience are fair game as far as I’m concerned.

  3. The point I was trying to make was this: it’s depressing to see both sides, to a certain extent, retreat to their defensive culture war crouches when nothing of substance has changed with respect to a prospective McCain presidency. This culture war stuff is like a dog-whistle.

  4. Is it despite or because of her self-confessed ignorance of foreign affairs and the Iraq/Iran issues that she makes the perfect symbol for the fusion that is today’s GOP?

    In one camp we have the mostly Jewish neocons fronting for the whole military-industrial complex, for whom the top issue is the Likudnik neocon wars and right behind it is heating up a new Cold War against Russia and extending American military globalism in general, but who are all at least OK with Reaganomics and – in a push – willing to lend off and on support to sociocons.

    In another we have the Christian right, whose top issues are things like abortion, gay marriage, school prayer and the like, but who are also at least OK (and many a lot more than just OK) with Reaganomics, bound to the neocon war agenda by really regrettable religious beliefs concerning Israel, a divine land grant, and the End Times.

    And out there in wing-nut radio land we have the gun aficionados, the race baiters, and the heavy libertarians to whom drowning the government in a bathtub sounds good, and who never met an American war they didn’t like.

    Ms. Palin?

    Something for all of them, no?

Leave a reply to Lee Cancel reply