A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Consumerism, simplicity, and sin

If Andrew Bacevich is right that our consumptive habits are the cause, not only of resource depletion and environmental degradation, but of our far-flung military adventurism, then the unpleasant conclusion seems to be that we need to start consuming less.

Here’s an article (via Book Forum) about, among other things, a professor in Western Pennsylvania (just down the road from where I went to college at a less prestigious state school) who’s urging people to do just that. And he doesn’t mean just greenwashing our consumerism with “eco-friendly” products. He ties it in to an actual downshifting toward a simpler lifestyle and making it possible for people to choose less work in exchange for more free time.

Having just re-read Reinhold Niebuhr’s Children of Light and Children of Darkness, I’m feeling a bit pessimistic about our ability to tame our appetites. Niebuhr points out that, unlike non-human animals, our appetites are virtually unlimited because of our ability to transcend our immediate experience. We don’t just want to be physically sated; we want prestige, power, and in some cases to dominate others. Niebuhr argues that it’s precisely because of our “spiritual” nature that we’re capable of great evil.

The task of politics, Niebuhr thinks, is not to remake human nature, but to channel our self-aggrandizing impulses into socially beneficial directions. It may be that hard realities–energy and food prices, climate change, resource wars–will force us to change our behavior in ways that idealism alone can’t.

At the same time, Niebuhr, who was so right on original sin, tended to give short shrift to redemption. The New Testament, by contrast, portrays a community of people who have been empowered to live differently–not grasping at worldly prestige and security because their worth and being are “hid with Christ.” Can our churches become communities like that? Places where people are fed with the bread of life and so don’t need to fill themselves with the world’s junk food?

6 responses to “Consumerism, simplicity, and sin”

  1. Can our churches become communities like that? Places where people are fed with the bread of life and so don’t need to fill themselves with the world’s junk food?

    For all that I’ve criticized Reinhold for not having a high enough ecclesiology, I feel like I’m caught between him and Hauerwas, which leaves me pessimistic about the Church’s ability to fill the void you’re talking about. That’s sort of at the root of Hauerwas’s vision of Christianity — that the Church is indeed capable of taking the place of consumerism, meaningless sex, and imperialism. Although I hate to follow Niebuhr down a hole that turns the Church into just a mass of sinners, I’m really shy about the alternative.

    Have you seen William Cavanaugh’s new book? He seems the most plausible high-church alternative to Hauerwas (he’s a student of H’s), and he has a book out on consumerism. It’s sitting on my shelf, but I haven’t had a chance to look at it yet. Going to try to read it on planes this weekend and I’ll try to blog about it next week sometime.

  2. I feel your pain, which is why I think we need to recover a concept of vocation, but not one that blesses the status quo as some classical Lutheran and Reformed versions did.

    Christopher has a good post on lay vocations here:

    http://thanksgivinginallthings.blogspot.com/2008/08/lay-vocations.html

    This are the sort of lines I’m thinking along: not the church taking the place of the world, but Jesus (whom we encounter in the church) empowering people to live differently in the world. I realize we need all sorts of Niebuhrian caveats about the corruptibility of even our best intentions here. 😉

    Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on the Cavanaugh book!

  3. And consuming less has the distinct advantage of being less expensive. Trying to get people to spend more money on something they (rightly or wrongly) may not care about is not a winning strategy. Using the “hard realities” will, I think, be the key to changing behavior. For example, linking energy independence (which increasingly means finding renewable energy technologies) to national security seems to be a smart move.

    About vocation: I’ve been wondering lately if we might be able to avoid propping up the status quo by talking about what constitutes “good work.” That not just anything we do is truly serving our neighbor. I’m thinking of C.S. Lewis’ essay “Good Work and Good Works,” which you can preview here.

  4. BOTH CANDIDATES, AS WELL AS CONGRESS, MIGHT DO WELL TO LISTEN TO ANDREW BACEVICH… NOT JUST HEAR HIM

    Only rarely does someone surface with qualifications as well as insights and a delivery that stimulate thinking. Even more rarely does an individual stimulate the very personal mental articulation of self observation.

    http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/08/andrew-bacevich-rare-sobering-voice.html

    Bacevich deserves as broad an audience as can be exposed to his thoughtful analysis.

  5. […] Confronting Consumption. Found here via Lee […]

Leave a reply to Chris Cancel reply