A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Hippie cons?

Dan McCarthy writes that, along with Ron Paulites, post-industrial localist conservatives are a hopeful sign on the Right, and kindly mentions this blog as a small data point. Whether this adds up to a “movement” is anyone’s guess, but the blogosphere (ironically) has given me the opportunity to be exposed to people who take issues like localism, food, sustainability, and the environment seriously, but from a distinctly conservative point of view (often, but not always, rooted in a religious view of the world).

I have in mind here folks like Russell Arben Fox, Patrick Deneen, John Schwenkler (who Dan also mentions), Rod Dreher, the Caelum et Terra bloggers, and the now defunct New Pantagruel webzine, among others. It remains to be seen, though, whether a) this impulse is confined to a few blogospheric eccentrics and malcontents (and I mean that with all affection!) and b) whether it’s properly seen as part of “the Right.” On the last point, I’m not terribly hopeful that American conservatism can or particularly wants to address the concerns that these folks are raising.

5 responses to “Hippie cons?”

  1. And then, though I would say this sort of thing fits where I’m headed, the religious aspects of this conservatism tend to scare the bejesus out of me.

  2. I agree – some of its proponents still seem heavily invested in culture war-style conservatism.

    Of couse, could be that deep down I’m just a liberal after all. 🙂

  3. For one explanation why religion/spirituality goes so well with Ron Paul spontaneous conservatism, check out this Muslim American’s blog entry:
    http://abuhatem.hadithuna.com/western-confucian/

  4. Lee,

    No, I don’t think so–you’re being a liberal. Rather, your conservatism is such that a realistic assessment of the human condition requires self-questioning and great care in thinking about imposing faith. Religious conservatives, even the crunch cons, tend to my mind to still imbibe too much of the positivistic American tendency that we can make it all better. It’s a flipside to progressive liberalism. Both think a great deal about changing the culture rather than recognizing that Christ and culture are in tension, and thus, one’s own assumptions bound up with Christ are in for criticism as much as anyone else’s. In two words, “you’re Lutheran”.

  5. […] since I also had the honor of being called out in the post in question, which in turn led me (and Lee) to say things which in turn led other people to say other things, and soon enough we had a […]

Leave a reply to Christopher Cancel reply