A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

D.C. = most walkable

Lucky for me as I walk pretty much everywhere I go. I might take the Metro once or twice a week, but we’re lucky enough to live in a neighborhood where pretty much all the necessities (and several of the luxuries) of life are within a couple blocks’ distance. Of course, we pay for that nice location in our expensive (and small!) apartment. But I love living somewhere that allows me to walk most places. I paid some serious commuting dues in the early 2000s living in the San Francisco Bay area and driving 1+ hour to work each way for over two years. So, I feel like I’ve earned living in a walkable city. 😉

To make a broader point, creating walkable communities should surely be a priority for our future, shouldn’t it? Pick your poison (obesity, peak oil, global warming, social anomie) and getting people out on the sidewalks and on their feet is at least part of the solution. Obviously many of our cities and suburbs (not to mention rural areas) simply aren’t designed to accomodate pedestrians, and to some extent that can’t be helped. But surely if we can subsidize the auto industry with all that concrete infrastructure we ought to be able to do something to make our communities more pedestrian-friendly.

2 responses to “D.C. = most walkable”

  1. That’s one of the things I like (& miss) about the DC area, too: the Metro, and the number of walkable places from the Metro.

    Ironically, Ballston was just a bunch of small strip malls when I was at Marymount as a student nearly 20 years ago. Today it’s unrecognizably different. The mall was more than adequate back then, but for the lack of a theater, which I think they have since rectified. I think the mistake with Ballston is simply that it’s easier for most people to go to other malls that have attracted national retailers, like Crystal City, say, or Tysons Corners. They were already more important than Ballston back then.

    My point in bringing up Ballston, though, is that it’s heralded as a success story, when in fact it took something like 15-20 years from the building of the Metro before the tall buildings started to come. That requires patience that many city planners don’t have.

    I, unfortunately, live in a city where sprawl is still king, especially after Hurricane Katrina. I live down the road from a mall and a bunch of useful stores. I’d love to walk there, but there’s no sidewalk, and the road isn’t the safest. I’d gladly do it myself, but usually I go with my wife and kids, and I’m not willing to risk their lives. Let’s not talk about the bus schedule & routes.

    Raleigh, NC was a very walkable city, at least within the Inner Beltline. I hope I can move back to someplace like that one day.

  2. Amen! However, try selling new urbanism and traditional neighborhood design to local zoning boards. To most of those fools, walkable communities = rowhomes = crime and drugs. They want McMansions on multi-acre lots to guarantee a high property value, and thus high level of property tax revenue. They can’t see the vision of increased tax revenue from increased density and commercial activity in well-planned town centers. Oh well . . .

Leave a reply to Chris Cancel reply