A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Heavy metal trivia

Heavy metal is the Protestantism of music: it splits into ever-smaller sects, with their devotees often anathematizing all others. You have speed, thrash, death, grind, doom, sludge, glam, goth, stoner, symphonic, prog, metalcore, grindcore, deathcore, etc. ad infinitum forever and ever Amen.

But did you know there’s a sub-genre called mathcore? Mathcore, according to Wikipedia:

is usually filled with discordant, somewhat technical riffing, complex time signatures and song structures, and passionate, energetic vocals. Songs played by bands of this style tend to vary from mere seconds in length to over 15 minutes and rarely feature a conventional verse-chorus song structure.

Case in point:

Now, even I find this virtually unlistenable.

(Note: this post doesn’t replace our regularly scheduled Friday metal.)

7 responses to “Heavy metal trivia”

  1. This sort of ethos has overrun “indie rock” at the moment too. I’ve heard this stuff called “time signature” before. It sort of epitomizes the kind of stuff that punk is supposed to be the remedy for. Rock is supposed to be about energy and passion and fun, not about how well you listened in your freshman music theory class.

    Luckily this kind of stuff has really never caught on with anybody other than a small cadre of frustrated “musicians” who are still astonished at why Dream Theater and King’s X aren’t the biggest bands in the world.

  2. Heh. Yeah, I used to work with this guy who went to the Berklee school of music in Boston and he was really mad that The Dave Matthews Band was so popular b/c he claimed there were other bands that were playing similar music but with a much higher degree of musicianship. I tried to explain why that sort of missed the point, but to no avail.

    (Of course, I was mad that DMB was so popular too, but not for the same reasons…)

  3. I agree–there is a reinvigoration of technically proficient rock. And this is rarely a good thing. Battles is the front runner in the indie camp. Sure, some of their stuff ventures towards King Crimson, Phish, etc. territory, but much of it is quite good and listenable. In fact, Lee, I think you’d like “Tonto” very much. It’s among the favorites on my youtube channel somewhere on this page:

    http://www.youtube.com/profile_favorites?p=r&user=bsroc&page=2

  4. Hmm, reminds me a bit of Norma Jean and Spitfire.

    \m/

    Ever listen to Meshuggah? It’s crunchier, but similar in its complex rhythms.

  5. bs – I listened to a couple of those Battles clips. Neat stuff! Do they do anything with more conventional vocals?

    Eric, I’ve been meaning to delve into Meshuggah. Any suggestions where to start?

  6. Chaosphere, for sure. The cover artwork is also about as metal as you can get (I have a sick long-sleeved black t-shirt of it too!).

  7. hi (and happy birthday man!)
    they do have some tracks with more conventional vocals, although I’m not as fond of many of them. Not because of the vocals, mind you, but because it gets a bit, well, proggy.

Leave a reply to Lee Cancel reply