A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Ratzinger vs. vicarious atonement?

Continuing with the Holy Week theme, Pontifications has posted an excerpt from then-Cardinal Ratzinger’s Introduction to Christianity that seems quite opposed to the traditional idea of vicarious atonement:

In the Bible the Cross does not appear as part of a mechanism of injured right; on the contrary, in the Bible the Cross is quite the reverse: it is the expression of the radical nature of the love that gives itself completely, of the process in which one is what one does and does what one is; it is the expression of a life that is completely being for others. To anyone who looks more closely, the scriptural theology of the Cross represents a real revolution as compared with the notions of expiation and redemption entertained by non-Christian religions, though it certainly cannot be denied that in the later Christian consciousness this revolution was largely neutralized and its whole scope seldom recognized. In other world religions, expiation usually means the restoration of the damaged relationship with God by means of expiatory actions on the part of men. Almost all religions center around the problem of expiation; they arise out of man’s knowledge of his guilt before God and signify the attempt to remove this feeling of guilt, to surmount the guilt through conciliatory actions offered up to God. The expiatory activity by which men hope to conciliate the Divinity and to put him in a gracious mood stands at the heart of the history of religion.

In the New Testament the situation is almost completely reversed. It is not man who goes to God with a compensatory gift, but God who comes to man, in order to give to him. He restores disturbed right on the initiative of his own power to love, by making unjust man just again, the dead living again, through his own creative mercy. His righteousness is grace; it is active righteousness, which sets crooked man right, that is, bends him straight, makes him correct. Here we stand before the twist that Christianity put into the history of religion. The New Testament does not say that men conciliate God, as we really ought to expect, since, after all, it is they who have failed, not God. It says, on the contrary, that “God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself” (2 Cor 5:19). This is truly something new, something unheard of—the starting point of Christian existence and the center of New Testament theology of the Cross: God does not wait until the guilty comes to be reconciled; he goes to meet them and reconciles them. Here we can see the true direction of the Incarnation, the Cross.

More here.

5 responses to “Ratzinger vs. vicarious atonement?”

  1. Whoa. That does sound awfully unusual, coming from a Pope. It sounds more like something a post-liberal would say. In my limited experience, at least.

  2. Sounds awfully Lutheran, too! Back in the days when Ratzinger was a creative theologian and didn’t have to be a guardian of the faith in the most specific sense, he actually proposed that the Augsburg Confession might be accepted as an authentically Catholic expression of faith.

  3. Chip, I was thinking the same thing. Reminiscient of Gerhard Forde’s polemic against “ladder theology” – the idea that we somehow “ascend” to God (even with the aid of grace). Rather, per Forde, Luther’s insight is that God always comes to us.

  4. Forde’s Word and World piece “Caught in the Act” (which I think I first found out about from you) has been very influential for me. Well, for that matter, nearly everything I have read by Forde has influenced me. There’s just something about him.

    I was particularly impressed with the idea of our rejection of the forgiveness he came to give us culminating in the crucifixion. God “won’t be satisfied until he succeeds in actually having mercy on whom he will have mercy. God, that is, won’t be satisfied until he succeeds in actually giving the concrete, unconditional forgiving he intends. As we can see from Jesus, God’s problem is how actually to have mercy on a world which will not have it.”

  5. As I remember now, also, Ratzinger was also the person who saved the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification when it looked like it was going to crash and burn.

    Pope Benedict and Forde – now there would be an interesting conversation to eavesdrop upon. 🙂

Leave a reply to eatingwords Cancel reply