A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Am I a conservative?

Blog-friend Russell Arben Fox of In Medias Res identified this humble blog as one of his “blogs that make you think” per some kind of game/meme that was going around (thanks, Russell!). Of course, few blogs make me think quite as much as Russell’s long, substantive posts on political philosophy written through the prism of his fairly unique brand of left-wing conservative communitarianism, so the feeling is mutual.

Interestingly (to me if no one else), Russell describes my outlook as “contrarian-if-mostly-conservative-in-some-sense.” I’m not entirely sure I’d “self-identify” as a conservative at this point; heaven knows I’ve spent a lot of time bashing the Bush administration and organized conservatism generally and very little time praising them. But I also don’t really think of myself as a liberal or a leftist. Or, for that matter, as a “moderate” or a “centrist.” Maybe that’s the contrarianism! Or maybe I’m just confused.

I think I still use certain “conservative” ideas as my template for thinking about politics – ones derived from a blend of libertarianism and traditionalism – but lately I’ve become more friendly to leftish views, as well as certain “green” notions (many of which I’d be tempted to argue are compatible with a kind of “conservatism rightly understood”).

But clearly political ideals can’t be detached from concrete social and political circumstances. If you think nearly everything the “conservative” party is doing is wrong, then don’t you end up functionally anti-conservative (even if not “liberal”)?

10 responses to “Am I a conservative?”

  1. Thanks for the kind words, Lee.

    “I think I still use certain ‘conservative’ ideas as my template for thinking about politics–ones derived from a blend of libertarianism and traditionalism–but lately I’ve become more friendly to leftish views, as well as certain ‘green’ notions (many of which I’d be tempted to argue are compatible with a kind of ‘conservatism rightly understood’). ”

    I think you summarize my own situating of you in relation to “conservatism” quite well here. I see your basic template–your root ontological presumptions, if we want to get fancy–as traditionalist; you believe that there are certain larger-than-the-individual verities that necessarily obtain in human life, and you want to preserve them. (Obviously I’m talking about religion here.) Politically, like a lot of other traditionalists, you wonder if liberal society–even libertarianism–isn’t the best way to conserve those things; but on the other hand, you also see that green thinking has something “conservative”–stewardship of the earth, humble living, etc.–about it as well. Sound about right?

    As for opposing the “conservative” party, well, who gets to define an ideology: its believers, or its public claimants and practioners? Ideally those two groups overlap, but when they don’t (and I don’t think they have much in America in recent years), then I’ll grant definitional power to the first group.

  2. At the moment, I am thinking of myself as “temperamentally conservative, wistfully libertarian — but above all, not illiberal.” That’s how I like to think of myself, anyway.

    Unfortunately, liberality seems to be ideologically untenable. Cela est bien dit, mais il faut cultiver notre jardin ….

  3. Don’t kid yourself, Lee. You’re a liberal wolf in conservative clothing, and you know it. 🙂

    Seriously, our terminology is so messed up right now that “liberal” or “conservative” really don’t mean much. Based on your posts on why you voted Republican in 2000 and then didn’t later, and also your differences with the Rev. Wright on “world policing,” I think it would be fair to call you an “anti-monarchist.” But that leaves the question of what you are for, and what kind of non-monarchical system best preserves space for “the permanent things” as Russell posted about eloquently above…

  4. The world needs more liberals. C’mon in — the water’s fine.

    Very nice blog here. I’ll be back.

  5. I don’t give a shit how you define yourself or how anybody else defines you. Despite our numerous ideaological disagreements (politics, eating meat, the merits of Dinosaur Jr.) your blog is great because you not only make people think, but you are a good thinker yourself. I couldn’t ask for a better bil either. Well maybe a richer one. But aside from that…

  6. Aw, thanks, man!

    Though the Dinosour Jr thing may yet prove an unbridgeable chasm…

  7. Lee,

    Um, I think that you need to update the code for your Christian Peace Bloggers webring. Michael W-W moved his blog to Word Press, so when you click on the link, it takes you to his old site where, um, other people now seem to be residing.

    Regarding politics, it’s amazing to me how much George W. Bush has shrunk my political vision. When I read you or other bloggers write about Wendell Berry, it’s like I’m hearing an echo down a long, long hallway. “Oh yes, Wendell Berry! That name does ring a bell! I used to love to read him.”

    Now all I read are political blogs, and I’m on the Exec. Committee of the local Democratic Party. I’m not who I was six years ago.

    I wonder if, when things go back to normal, I wil allow myself the pleasure of reading more contrarian views, and maybe even acting on them.

  8. Good grief – thanks for the tipoff, Marvin. Should be fixed now.

  9. Michael Westmoreland-White

    Thanks for clueing in Lee on the need to update the CPB html code. I thought I had sent out a memo on that–and am still furious at Blogger for letting my old domain be hacked by that -STUFF.

    I like the libertarians on civil liberties, not on economics, where I am more closely related to democratic socialists. Labels depend on definitions. My father told me that all Christians should be, at once, politically liberal, conservative, and radical: Liberal–open to the future, working for changes that will bring about more justice to the earth; conservative–preserving what needs to be preserved; radical–going back to the roots for our inspiration.

  10. “If you think nearly everything the “conservative” party is doing is wrong, then don’t you end up functionally anti-conservative (even if not “liberal”)?”

    Well, that’s how I did it.

Leave a reply to Chip Frontz Cancel reply