A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

The road to hell, etc.

With Iraq as Exhibit A, U of Chicago law prof Eric Posner (son of Richard, I think) argues for a presumption against “humanitarian” war in the Washington Post.

Many well-meaning people – often, but not exclusively liberals – who otherwise tend to be “anti-war” find themselves with an itchy trigger finger when it comes to humanitarian disasters. But here, as elsewhere, policies have to be judged not by their proponents’ good intentions, but by those policies’ likely consequences.

Link via Matthew Yglesias.

2 responses to “The road to hell, etc.”

  1. Sure, I agree that one has to look to consequences. But that’s not everything. We might say, for example, in the face of a genocide, that it’s just going to cost too much to intervene. In fact, countries often say that (or act like it) – when they do, they’re looking at consequences and weighing monetary cost versus saving other people’s lives or international goodwill or whatever benefits are thought to be in play.

    I haven’t read the Posner piece, but Iraq is not a case of humaintarian intervention in the first place. That’s simply a specious claim that came along after proof of WMDs, “imminent threat,” etc. was apparently not forthcoming. The typical threshold criteria for intervention were nonexistent prior to the war, the administration knew that, and was never in a position to make the case. It was simply a second- or third-best rhetorical option.

    This is also why it’s amisnomer to label Bush an “idealist.”

  2. I think that’s right that we shouldn’t talk simply cost vs. benefits for us, but for the ostensible beneficiaries of any envisioned intervention. That’s more what I take Posner’s point to be.

    And you’re right that Bush, et al. were in all likelihood not motivated by humanitarian concerns, but there were certainly liberal intellectuals and pundits (I’m thinking of the TNR crowd in particular) who made such arguments and who helped to provide a nominally bipartisan cover for the decision to go to war. How much influence they actually had in ginning up support is, of course, debatable.

Leave a reply to Lee Cancel reply