The church of the future?

Here’s an interesting piece about the community that has grown out of Mars Hill Church in Seattle. While it has some of the heavy breathing about conservative Christians you’d expect to find at Salon (“Within this movement lies something as old as America itself, and as terrifying and alluring as anything Orwell predicted”), the author seems to get that this kind of tight-knit community is filling a void in many people’s lives, especially those who’ve come from broken homes, or have had problems with drugs, or generally don’t fit in with our idea of respectable church folk.

Now, personally, there’s a lot about Mars Hill, at least as described in this piece, that I find objectionable and even a bit creepy. The combination of hipster culture and dispensational theology for starters. Not to mention the strident anti-feminism and the emphasis on obedience (at least as quoted in this piece, Mark Driscoll, the head pastor, seems much more a law than gospel kind of guy).

But at the same time, it’s pretty darn difficult to imagine a mainline church mounting a life-changing project like this. It’s easy for mainliners to use the things they think are wrong about conservative evangelicals as an excuse for not learning from them. Not that I’m eager to run off and join an intentional community, but something like Mars Hill seems to be in an entirely different league from shallow self-help prosperity gospel tripe or your standard megachurch. Lots of young people in particular seem interested in a faith that is demanding and requires commitment and transformation. If the more traditional churches don’t think about what that might mean for them, other churches will pick up the slack.

Comments

2 responses to “The church of the future?”

  1. CPA

    I used to be part of a Presbyterian (PCA) church that was somewhat similar (albeit less intense) than the Mars Hill community. My theology changed a bit (not on family issues, though), but the biggest thing in adapting to the LCMS church I love was the lower degree of commitment. (There were personal reasons why I couldn’t get involved as much as I wished, too). I live a normal life now, weekly Bible study isn’t the high point of my week, but you know what?

    I miss that old intensity. I miss the sense of community. I miss the sense of family. I even miss the sex-segregated fellowshiping after Bible study that the reporter notes.

    I can live without it, but I will probably always miss it.

    So I don’t doubt there are problems with the Mars Hill folks — as with all of us. But right now that’s not what I want to emphasize.

  2. kim

    I have always found intentional communities appealing in their commitment to every part and moment of one’s life being in service to God rather than just Sunday mornings and a couple hours here and there. A few years ago, I briefly visited the Iona Community in Scotland, which is a much smaller and more liberal version of the community described at Mars Hill, but the excitement and sense of mission seem similar (no focus on populating the world with lots of Christian babies there, however).

Leave a reply to kim Cancel reply