A More Humble Foreign Policy?

From James Mann at Foreign Policy magazine:

The Doomsayers suggest that Bush’s second term is likely to produce further military interventions overseas, along the lines of Iraq in 2003. Perhaps Syria may be the next target of U.S. military power, they suggest, or Iran. They believe that the neoconservatives (that is, officials such as Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz), who were the driving force behind the Bush administration’s preventive war against Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, will have even greater power and influence, now that the president has won reelection. “Secretary of State Colin Powell is not staying for a second term,” warned one Foreign Service officer, writing under the byline “Anonymous” on Salon.com last month. “When he goes the last bulwark against complete neoconservative control of U.S. foreign policy goes with him.”

The Skeptics contend that Bush’s foreign policy in his second term will turn out to be more cautious and less belligerent than his first, if not by choice, then by compulsion. Whatever some hawks might like to do, the reality is that the Bush administration will face a series of constraints—military, diplomatic, political, and economic—that will curb its ability to launch new preventive wars. Moreover, say adherents of the Skeptic school, the power of the neoconservatives inside the administration will probably be diminished, not augmented, during Bush’s second term. …

I’m not suggesting that Bush’s approach to the world will be utterly transformed during a second term. The vision the Vulcans [i.e. hawkish neoconservatives] carried into office four years ago—a view of foreign policy based above all on overwhelming U.S. military power and a skepticism about accommodations with other countries—will not be abandoned.

But I also don’t think Bush’s reelection means that United States is gearing up for some new military invasion. There are limits. Iraq has proved that fact, even to the Bush administration. And a sense of limits may turn out to be one of the defining characteristics of Bush’s second term.

Read more here.

Comments

2 responses to “A More Humble Foreign Policy?”

  1. Marcus

    Maybe we’ll get lucky and somebody will realize all that “hyper-puissance” stuff was propaganda and hyperbole.

    Or, less politely, put it this way. Will somebody be forced to admit, at least in foro interno, that the Chinese commentary the other day was correct and most of this “world’s only superpower” stuff is just bluster?

  2. Lee

    Yes – I think the left and the (modern) right both share delusions of omnipotence with respect to the USA. The former in blaming America for all the world’s ills, and the latter in thinking we can right all the world’s ills.

Leave a reply to Lee Cancel reply