Austin Farrer was, among other things, a renowned Anglican theologian and a friend of C.S. Lewis. I’ve been reading his book Saving Belief – a kind of primer of sorts Christian theology originally delivered as a series of lectures to undergraduates. In his chapter on “Heaven and Hell” he has this to say about Christians who want to downplay or remain agnostic about the resurrection and the world to come:
Christ in glory is the heart of heaven, and it is difficult to see how those Christians who leave the life to come an open question can be Christians at all. If Christ is not now in glory, then this is a Christless world and God is a Christless God and we are Christless men. Those who say heaven is nothing to us now but an optional hope, may say the same of Christ; unless, that is, they have received a revelation not imparted to the rest of us, making heaven to be a place for one glorified man, and for no more. (p. 146)
I’ve always thought it odd when devotees of a religion founded on the resurrection of a dead man shove discussion of heaven off to one side. While some of the reasons for doing it might be laudable– to encourage a focus on creating a better world here and now, say–the end result is to drain Christianity of any lasting hope. After all, even if (per impossible) we succeeded in creating a perfectly just society, there would still be millions and millions of creatures who never lived to see it. Should people be deprived of the hope in heaven for the sake of a far off worldly utopia that may never arrive (and, even if it did, wouldn’t last)?

Leave a reply to Christopher Cancel reply