A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Economics as if people (and other living things) mattered

I’m in Indianapolis visiting family, and one of the things I like to do whenever I’m here is make a trip to Half Price Books.

Yesterday I picked up a copy of For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future by World Bank economist Herman Daly and process theologian John Cobb.

My views on economics have been in flux for the past few years. I was at one time attracted to the libertarian exaltation of the free market, but I’ve become increasingly convinced of the limitations of that view.

The conservative side of me is skeptical that a system based on acquisitiveness can really be conducive to virtue, especially as the logic of the market threatens to take over more and more areas of life. The liberal side of me is unconvinced that the rising tide will really lift all boats, at least at a rate fast enough to forestall ecological disaster. As I’ve become more interested in environmental issues I’ve been exposed to the arguments of those who maintain that unlimited growth is a dead end, literally.

Daly and Cobb seem to be following in the footsteps of thinkers like E.F. Schumacher. They embrace the market and recognize that central planning is unworkable, but they also want to situate the market within a social and moral framework that respects the integrity of communities, both national and more local ones.

In this respect their project seems to hark back to the decentralized “humane economy” of conservative Swiss economist Wilhelm Roepke, a thinker I admire a lot. Their goal is to rethink economic policy in a way that treats human beings as more than an abstract homo economicus, as well as being sensitive to what, following Wendell Berry, they call the “Great Economy” of all life on Earth.

I’ve only read the introduction, but I’m eager to see where Daly and Cobb go with their project and will probably post more on these ideas as I go.

5 responses to “Economics as if people (and other living things) mattered”

  1. If you haven’t read it, you’d probably get a lot out of Kathryn Tanner’s Economy of Grace. She talks at length about how to make the market more focused on transcendent values if we accept as given that capitalism is going to be around for a good long while.

  2. I think you will really like Schumacher. Be sure to also check out some his economic friends including the Mutualists and Georgists. The Distributists (Schumacher), Mutualists, and Georgists all have basically the same concerns and see the same root problems but prescribe different solutions.

    An excellent book to get started is probably the recently published “Capitalism 3.0” by Peter Barns. It’s available for free online – http://onthecommons.org/files/Capitalism_3.0_Peter_Barnes.pdf

  3. I read Daly and Cobb’s book years ago, as an undergraduate at BYU, and I’ve gone back to it many times in the years since. But it’s always interesting to hear other people’s opinions of books you think you know well, so I’m looking forward to your posts.

  4. […] for community As I mentioned previously, Daly and Cobb’s central concern is that the abstractions of economics leave out aspects of […]

  5. An Alternative to Capitalism?

    The following link, takes you to a “utopian” article, entitled “Home of the Brave?” which I wrote and appeared in the American Daily which is published in Phoenix, Arizona on March 14, 2006.
    http://www.americandaily.com/article/12389

    John Steinsvold

Leave a comment