A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

Evangelism in the mainline and the loss of transcendence

Chris at Even the Devils Believe has a good post on birth rates and evangelism in mainline Protestantism, jumping off from the recent comments from Episcopal Church Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori about how Episcopalians aren’t incresing their numbers due to the low birth rates among “better-educated” people who care about preserving the earth.

Leaving aside the condescending tone of those remarks toward our Catholic and Mormon friends, Chris correctly points out the whistling-past-the-graveyard nature of this attitude. He also notes that Christianity is not exclusively, or even primarily, a religion that propagates itself by inheritance, but by evangelism, which is where mainline Protestantism has been falling down on the job. And it needn’t be a matter of “liberalism,” narrowly defined as churches who have centrist-to-liberal stances on the usual litany of issues.

While I try to resist sweeping generalization about “postmodernism” or what “postmodern” people are supposedly like, I think that one thing that can be said is that postmodern people, outside of a relatively small band of committed secularists, are open to an experience of the transcendent. The closed clockwork universe of high modernism probably never had much of a hold on most people’s minds, but it’s also lost much of whatever intellectual justification it once had. I’ve argued before that “supernaturalism” is not what keeps people away from religion. When theologians decry rampant “secularism” I sometimes think that’s because they are taking their academic colleagues as representative of the population as a whole.

But, however important it may be to engage secularist or hard-core “naturalist” thought, that’s simply not where most people are coming from (the same might be said of “postmodern” thought, which is still largely confined to the academy, but that’s a topic for another day). So, if there is a “liberalism” (or maybe “modernism” is a better word) that’s at fault here, I think it might be the variety which downplays the transcendent, or “vertical,” aspect of faith in an attempt to appeal to “modern” people.

3 responses to “Evangelism in the mainline and the loss of transcendence”

  1. I think it comes down to asking if we think Jesus is a unique revelation of God’s will for humanity or if he is one of a multitude of “choices”. How one answers that question says something about the motivation one has to evagelize.

  2. Lee, I definitely think you’re right about the vertical component to worship of God being absent from the mainline at times. It is hard to get people to church if the only thing you can offer is fellowship with other humans — how does that differ from a bowling league? I had just this problem at the ELCA parish I attended during college. It was like a country club — all the way to the members ignoring new people until they’d been there literally for years.

    LP — as I mentioned in my post, I think it is possible to have a considered pluralism that still leads to successful evangelism. Perhaps I should blog about this topic a little more to expand on what I mean — maybe after my Johnny Cash posts next week. I wouldn’t claim that Jesus is one of “a multitude” of choices, and he is not just a “wise sage” to me, but I am probably somewhat more pluralistic than orthodoxy supports. Still, I believe evangelism is not only possible in such a context, but necessary. I don’t think pluralism is really at fault here (unless it is the knee-jerk “I want people to like me” pluralism that doesn’t describe anything true about the world).

  3. Good point about the vertical aspect. So many liberal/mainline leaders/theologians seem to think that Freud, Marx and David Hume are still in charge, and that they have to downplay or eliminate all that weird supernatural stuff. I just don’t understand it, and I’ve become a mainliner myself. I guess I was born, raised and educated in a post-modern milieu, and they weren’t.

Leave a comment