What would Jesus eat?

Stephen H. Webb, author of some excellent books on Christianity, food, and animals, reviews a book advocating a kosher diet(!) for Christians. Webb deems the author, Hope Egan, a “neo-Ebionite.” Egan argues, rather strangely, that the dietary laws from Leviticus are still in force for Christians, apparently, at least in part, because they represent the divinely-sanctioned road to health.

Like Webb, I am, at best, a demi-vegetarian. In the nearly two years since I’ve gone veggie I’ve probably eaten meat fewer than a dozen times, so I’m obviously not super-strict about it (most recently I fell off the wagon at Thanksgiving dinner, enjoying some delicious smoked turkey!). And I eat fish regularly.

So, I think Webb gets it right at the end of his review:

Some theologians (disclaimer: I am one of them) argue that the kosher laws have more theological than medical significance. Sacrificial regulations mediate the original vegetarianism of the Garden of Eden and the Prophets’ anticipation of the peaceable kingdom. In this perspective, some form of vegetarianism is a diet of hope and a witness to God’s plan for the world. But Egan believes we should refrain from eating pork and shellfish simply because that is God’s design for healthy living. This was disappointing news for me, because I reward my (usual) abstention from meat with many opportunities to eat plenty of tasty shrimp, on the grounds that they feel no pain. According to Egan’s interpretation of Leviticus, however, shrimp are scavengers and thus dangerous carriers of disease.

What’s a conscientious Christian eater to do: embrace the Torah, eat meat as an expression of humankind’s dominion over nature, or give up meat as a protest against factory farming? Egan thinks we will eat hamburgers in heaven derived from humanely raised, organically fed, and biblically slaughtered cows. I doubt that, but I also admit that if the Bible favors a vegetarian diet, it does so in a subtle and modest way. The question of a Christian diet cannot be resolved by appealing to the Torah, our right to use animals, or their rights to be protected from us. We have to begin with Christ, and wherever we end, we need to be subtle and modest about our dietary claims.

Comments

2 responses to “What would Jesus eat?”

  1. Joshie

    Another great post! I read a review of that book in the CC and it struck me as pretty odd too.

    Part of the problem, it seems, is that there is an evangelical psychological drive to find some scientific basis for the food laws in order to make the bible seem wise and reasonable.

    The Bible was written by ancient people, people who lived millenia before modern science was born, and millenia before anybody knew that germs caused disease. So to attribute the food laws to concerns about germs is grossly anachronistic. The laws are there because God put them there for Israel- this seems to be the only rationale for them put forth in scripture and the tradition.

    There is a book called What would Jesus Eat? that my other bil bought for us a few Christmases ago that extolls the benefits of the mediterranean diet, although he does include recipies for Sole, a fish that lacks scales, and thus is not kosher!

  2. Anonymous

    Hmmm. With all due respect, I think you folks ought to read the book before you opine on it. You might be surprised, as it appears, IMHO that Mr. Webb only did a light skim of about half of it before writing his review. The bulk of Holy Cow is solid biblical analysis of relevant passages (only a small amount covers science), which somehow Mr. Webb chose to ignore in his review. You can skim at least some of them, if you’re interested, at http://www.HolyCowNews.Com.

Leave a comment