In defense of Narnia

I’ve been trying to ignore most of the Narnia hype in the run-up to the movie (though I’m looking forward to the movie itself). Like with The Passion of the Christ I find the idea of a “Christian” marketing blitz pretty distasteful.

But this article is worth a read. Michael Nelson, a professor of political science at Rhodes College, defends the Narnia books from Philip Pullman’s charges that they’re sexist, racist, gratuitously violent, and “loveless.” Pullman, the author of a series of apparently explicitly anti-Christian children’s books, seems to be on a one-man crusade to discredit Lewis. Though it doesn’t appear that Lewis’ popularity is in any danger at this point.

Incidentally, the Inquirer carried an excerpt this morning from a letter that Lewis had written saying that he was “absolutely opposed” to a live-action film version of the Narnia books. He was more open to the idea of a cartoon “if only Disney did not combine so much vulgarity with his genius!” (Disney is producing the movie.) Make of that what you will.

(Link via Tolle, Blogge)

Comments

2 responses to “In defense of Narnia”

  1. Joshie

    Checked out the His Dark Materials series on Amazon, they got pretty mixed reviews. The consesus seemed to be that the first book was great (even if the characters were a bit unrealistic for their age), the second pretty good and the third one a preachy, dissapointing mess. And that the armored polar bears were awesome.

  2. Eric Lee

    That “For the Love of Narnia” article was excellent! Thanks for sharing.

    Peace,

    Eric

Leave a comment