A Thinking Reed

"Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature, but he is a thinking reed" – Blaise Pascal

The Future of the GOP: Populist or Royalist?

Reihan Salam thinks they would do well to address the economic concerns of those middle- and working-class socially conservative voters who are putting them in office. “Get the government off our backs” doesn’t resonate with these voters as much as it might have in the 80s.

Alternatively, a moderately socially conservative Democrat Party could pick off many of these voters if, e.g. the costs of healthcare and child-rearing become too onerous. The GOP has benefitted from the Dems’ scorched earth commitment to abortion rights and other elements of an anti-traditionalist cultural agenda, but the D’s may be wising up.

My diagnosis is that conservatives have turned shrinking government from being a means (to revitalizing communities and private initiative) to an end in itself. But no sane conservative thinks we can do without government entirely. And libertarian zeal for smashing the state appeals to few people beyond a small group of ideologues and think-tankers.

One response to “The Future of the GOP: Populist or Royalist?”

  1. Quite right.

    I just switched parties from the party of greed to the party of vice because I thought, globally speaking, the GOP is just using social conservatism as bait to bring in voters. It uses fear of terrorism in the same way. Their real agenda combines Zionism and the neo-con wars with bare-knuckle capitalism.

    Not that the Dems are much better. To some extent, they use social democracy and opposition to the bare-knuckle version of capitalism as bait to bring in voters. They do the same with opposition to Iraq and the neo-con wars. Their real agenda combines abortion and middle-class feminism, the sexual revolution, and American hyper-puissance without quite so much aggression as the neo-cons.

    On both sides, the bait is for the mass vote. The real agenda is for the rich and the mighty, both wings of which are commited to playing risk on the world board.

    But the Dem defense of their social democratic side is more real and valuable than GOP posturing on abortion – which is weakening, anyway. As is the Dem opposition to even more and wider war.

    Anyway, for now.

    Still pretty close, though. And pretty ugly.

Leave a comment