• Cheer Up and Vote?

    Wow – it’s like this was written just for me: This is not an article for those who are unabashedly in love with democracy, who look forward to election year with patriotic zeal directed first of all to the nation and second of all to one of the political parties. I write instead for the…

  • The Choice for Conservatives?

    It’s not so clear says former congressman Bob Barr (R-GA).

  • The Machieavellian Messianist

    I have to say, I get nervous at the idea of this guy whispering things in Karl Rove’s ear: “Any discussion of America and human rights must begin with the recognition that this country was created in a revolutionary period and that the democratic revolution — of which America is but one element — is,…

  • Church and State, Faith and Reason

    One persistent criticism of President Bush is that he has eroded the “wall of separation” between church and state by his attempts to legislate “private” religious views. The most common examples are his limitations on federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research (ESCR), support for measures limiting abortion, and his so-called faith-based initiative offering federal money…

  • Religion, Rationality and Terror

    The Maverick Philosopher has an instructive post on evidentialism and the ethics of belief in light of an argument from Sam Harris that religion qua religion is evil and dangerous. I offered a rebuttal to Harris here. UPDATE: In my original post I mistakenly identified Sam Harris as “John Harris.” Thanks to Bill Vallicella for…

  • War and the Onus Probandi

    One of the reasons I am always reluctant to support a given decision to go to war is because I believe the burden of proof must always lie on the party advocating war. And since war involves the killing and maiming of hundreds or thousands of people, it only seems just that the bar of…

  • The Maverick Philosopher Gets the Last Word

    The Maverick Philosopher has responded to this post continuing our exchange on Iraq. His conclusion: So perhaps the upshot is this. Although the war in Iraq was not a diversion from the war on terror as Kerry and others claim, it is nonetheless arguable that given what we know (or at least justifiably believe) now,…

  • Justification and Knowledge in the Matter of WMDs

    As anyone who’s studied philosophy (or a strong dose of common sense) can tell you, there’s a big difference between having knowledge and having a justified belief. I can be justified in believing X even if X turns out, in fact, to be false. Being justified requires, it is usually thought, having good reasons for…

  • Administrative Note

    Apparently when you change templates on Blogger it wipes out all your sidebar links. Grumble, grumble…

  • An Exchange on Iraq with the Maverick Philosopher

    A few days ago Bill Vallicella posted an entry on his blog criticizing what he dubbed “the diversion argument” – i.e. the claim made by John Kerry and others that the war in Iraq constitutes a diversion or distraction from the war on terrorism proper. Dr. Vallicella counters that the war in Iraq can legitimately…